Automated penetration testing tools often create a false sense of security when reports show fewer findings over successive runs, leading organizations to mistake stability for actual security. A webinar by Picus Security addresses this critical gap, highlighting how automated pentests miss vulnerabilities that require expert analysis and context. The issue becomes particularly problematic when le
Your pentest report looks clean. That might be the problem. Run automated pentesting long enough, and the new findings start to dry up. By the third or fourth run, fewer issues appear. The report looks stable. Leadership reads "stable" as "secure." It usually isn't. The work slows down. The risk does not. That gap is what a The Hacker News webinar with Picus Security sets out to close. Autumn
Originally published at thehackernews.com
60-minute technical evaluation, no obligation. We'll map the ideas in this article to your environment.
